One of the ideas proposed to counter the disadvantages of obtaining a driver`s license at the age of 16 is to raise the driving age. By allowing a longer course duration, it is believed that young people can become individual drivers with better skills because they have had more time to practice with their parents or trainers. Without personal mobility, young people are limited in where and when they go. Not only does this have an impact on the human rights of young people, but it can also have far-reaching implications. B as a blow to the economy when young people find that their ability to work is limited. Restricting the freedom of young people? You`re kidding? Freedom is everything to young people. If you take that away, what do they have? Just because a person is young doesn`t mean they`re not able to drive safely. In fact, the younger the driver, the more he learns. If you do this, it can lead to more teens driving illegally. 2. This makes the family plan more difficult to manage. When children reach a certain age, they start doing a job while they go to school.
There are sports exercises that can be followed, often right after school. If a 16-year-old (or 17-year-old) cannot drive because the driving age has been raised, another family member will have to stand up to provide these transportation services. If this is not possible, carpooling with other families would also be necessary. This additional pressure could make it difficult to manage parents` work responsibilities in a single-parent home or a home where both work to make ends meet. Raising the age does not guarantee a reduction in deaths. On the contrary, it would only change the statistics from “17 to 20 years” to “18 to 21 years”. The reason drivers crash is a lack of experience, and an 18-year-old with one year of experience is just as likely as a 17-year-old with one year of experience. By the way, it would be the same with a 35-year-old man with a year of experience. An increase in age would therefore not significantly increase the number of deaths and injuries.
You may be able to change your age, but you can`t change people! In addition, it cannot logically be said that the driving age should be increased because teenagers harm others and/or are injured while driving. For example, a parallel can be found in driving statistics for men versus women. According to studies, men of all ages are 77% more likely to kill someone while driving than women. It would be just as illogical to raise the driving age to 18 as banning men from driving.it won`t help if you sit on the tour for two more years and do nothing, you might be more mature at 18, but that doesn`t mean you`re mature enough for the road. The driving age should not be raised to 21, because if a person is an adult at the age of 18, they should also have the privilege of driving. At the age of 18, individuals are granted several privileges and responsibilities such as the right to vote, the opportunity to enlist in the military, the ability to open a bank account, as well as other things. If a person at the age of 18 receives all these privileges, it would not make sense for them not to have a driver`s license either. If 18-year-olds can do these important things, it wouldn`t make sense to increase the driving age beyond that. If age were to change, it would be more difficult for these young adults to get around. By the age of 18, most people are in college. A shortage of college-aged drivers would create a need for more public transportation.
Changing the driving age to 21 would not be fair, especially since adults would also lose the privilege. An ongoing topic of discussion in the world of safety was whether the driving age should be raised. Usually, drivers must be 16 or 17 years old to drive alone. There are many people, including politicians and security experts, who want to raise the age to 18. In fact, if teens are allowed to drive at an early age, their parents can tell them what they`re doing wrong and how they should adjust their behavior to become a better driver. “Age has no influence on driving – how do you like that?” Whether or not the legal driving age should be raised is certainly a debate of interest. It`s hard to say for sure, but my position would be that age should be left alone. Again, it is discriminatory to force teenagers to be more active by denying them the right to drive, while the rest of the population does what they want. In this context, young people should be able to choose whether they want to drive or use other, more active means of transport. Therefore, it can also make a lot of sense in this regard to raise the driving age so that young drivers can better solve their problems themselves. This is just a case of peer pressure.
We don`t need to make laws or adopt a culture just because other people are doing the same. When it comes to the legal age of driving, Germany and other European countries are different from the United States, have different cultures, different routes, and different laws. Assuming their driving age will not give us exactly the same results as them. Although Germany does not allow its teenagers to get a driver`s license before the age of 18, it still allows them to drive at 17 as long as they are supervised by adults. I have been living in Germany for 12 years and I can tell you that their roads are much more complicated and dangerous than ours. They have a case for their higher legal age. Young drivers cause most accidents due to inexperience, not lack of maturity. No matter how old people start driving, they will have accidents because they have little experience. This question arises only because young people are easily to blame. An adult who has just started driving statistically has as many accidents as a young person. It`s not ALL teenagers who are dangerous, just a small percentage. Did you know that men are 77% more likely to kill someone while driving than women, which means we just have to let women drive? It`s the same thing you unfairly stereotype teenagers! Also, what would happen if 18-year-olds got their licence at the age of 16, which completely refutes your point of view when you said that studies show that 16-year-olds have more car accidents than 18-year-olds! As if the brain of a 21-year-old was not more developed than that of an 18-year-old? And think about it, but most of the hoons on the street are 20 years old, not their teenagers.
In the vast majority of states, the legal age for unattended driving is 16. The youngest legal drivers in South Dakota are 14 years and 6 months old, while the oldest minimum age in New Jersey is set at 17. In Pennsylvania, the minimum age for unattended driving is set at 16 years and 6 months. Personally, I believe that the age of the driver should be raised to 18 years. Most European countries have raised the driving age to 18 and they seem to be doing well. Germany is a good example. Why not follow their example? In my opinion, there are better alternatives that can be much more effective in increasing safety on our roads, and therefore increasing the driving age may not make too much sense. This luxury is also more convenient for parents, as they are not responsible for driving their children to school or practices. People have this overly assertive stance towards 16-year-old drivers to drive and believe that they should take the initiative to raise the legal age to start at 18. I cannot make assumptions about the general population of teenagers because of a tiny percentage of other teenagers who are irresponsible.
A lack of maturity does not matter in these situations, because learning to drive is acquired through experience. As an 18-year-old, as a driver, you don`t have to have any requirements other than to take the driving test to get your driver`s license. .